Mexican Diplomat: Merely Because Someone Gets Tortured Doesn’t Mean He’s Innocent

Category: Blog
359 0

WASHINGTON — A Mexican diplomat denounced his government’s human rights fails Wednesday, but cautioned that only because someone is tortured doesn’t mean that person is innocent.

Speaking at a panel at the Wilson Center, Mexico’s ambassador to the Organization of American State, Luis Alfonso de Alba, acknowledged that the investigation into 43 students who were kidnapped last year had been beset by allegations that suspects and witnesses were tortured. At the same hour, he insisted that some of the more than 100 people jailed in connection with the country’s highest-profile human rights occurrence might be guilty.

MANDEL NGAN/ Getty Images
Mexico’s ambassador to the Organization of American State, Luis Alfonso de Alba, speaks at the Wilson Center on the report of the Interdisciplinary Group of Independent Experts dealing with the disappearance4 3 students in Mexico. Alfonso de Alba recognise widespread allegations of torture, but cautioned not to assume suspects were innocent.

“In our country there are people, like myself, who think that any declaration obtained using torturing nullifies the[ judicial] process, ” Alonso de Alba said. “But that — and I want to highlight this — that doesn’t mean that the person is innocent. What it means it that we have to redo the process and in some cases, obviously, such person or persons will be freed because there’s no proof against him except that which was extracted through torture.”

“But let’s not automatically associate innocence with these people, ” he added, saying that doing so could lead the Mexican populace to view “the protection of human rights as an eventual obstacle to the implementation of justice.”

Alfonso de Alba delivered the remarks alongside four members of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights’ group of experts, which provided international support for the investigation into attacks on the students.

The conclusions of the IACHR panel, presented in two hefty reports, sharply contradicted the version of events given by the Enrique Pena Nieto administration. The panel criticized the governmental forces for failing to pursue promising lines of investigation and for relying on confessions from suspects — some of whom were allegedly tortured — rather than basing the investigation on sound physical proof. The group’s second report, released last month, documented 17 instances of torture based on government medical reports and corroborated in several instances with interviews.

It is illegal under Mexican statute to acknowledge proof wrenched from witnesses or suspects use torturing. The practice also creates unreliable witnes, the experts said.

MANDEL NGAN/ Getty Images
Mexico’s Ambassador to Austria Luis Alfonso de Alba( L) and Angela Buitrago( R) of Colombia watch as Carlos Martn Beristain( C) of Spain speaks at the Wilson Center.

“There were clear signs of torture, ” Francisco Cox, a Chilean human rights attorney and one of the IACHR experts, told WorldPost. “When you torture someone, they’re not going to give you good information.”

On the night of Sept. 26, 2014, Mexican police assaulted a group of students from a teachers college who had traveled to the city of Iguala to commandeer buses the students planned to take to a protest in Mexico City. Unidentified gunmen also assaulted a bus carrying a high school soccer team in a related incident. Wholly, six people succumbed over the course of the night and the next morning. Forty-three students were abducted.

The brazen attacks and forced disappearances catapulted the occurrence to international prominence and galvanized a national protest movement against impunity in a country beset by drug war-fueled violence and widespread corruption.

Former Attorney General Jesus Murillo Karam said in November 2014 that the students were abducted by police, then handed off to members of the Guerreros Unidos drug gang, who killed them and incinerated their bodies at a trash dump in the neighboring township of Cocula.

But independent groups like the IACHR panel have disposed the hypothesi, which is not been endorsed by forensic proof. The government’s occurrence, which rests mainly on confessions and other witnes that is often contradictory, has largely unraveled under independent scrutiny.

Claudia Torrens/ Associated Press
Antonio Tizapa, the father of Jorge Antonio Tizapa, one of the 43 Mexican students who disappeared, poses for a photo at the City University of New York, in Manhattan, Wednesday, March 18, 2015. Tizapasaid he has lost his faith in the Mexican government to carry out the investigation because they have lied in the past.

The Pena Nieto administration’s mishandling of the investigation has undermined the parents’ religion in the government.

“I wouldn’t want anyone to be in the shoes of both parents, ” Antonio Tizapa, whose son Jorge Antonio Tizapa is among the missing 43, told the crowd Wednesday. “It’s very painful. We, as mothers, don’t trust the[ Mexican] government. That’s why we sought international assistance — because the government has lied.”

Read more:

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


  • No categories
Register now to get updates on promotions and coupons.
%d bloggers like this: