Former fashion director Lucinda Chambers didn’t hold back one bit in a new interview about being fired from British Vogue, blistering manner magazines for inducing nervousnes in readers and lacking usefulness.
Chambers told the fashion publication Vestoj that she was fired in simply three minutes when she was axed in May after 35 years at the publication. The interview became the buzz of Paris Fashion Week when it was published online Monday, in part because Chambers is savagely honest about one “crappy” Vogue cover she disliked and the reason she’d already stopped reading the magazine.
” I’m not ashamed of “whats happened to” me ,” Chambers told Vestoj, adding,” I know[ my photoshoots] weren’t all good- some were crappy. The June cover with Alexa Chung in a stupid Michael Kors T-shirt is crap. He’s a big advertiser so I knew why I had to do it. I knew it was cheesy when I was doing it, and I did it anyway .”
Chambers also opened up about what she said are the harmful effects of reading and working for a publication like British Vogue, which she said she hadn’t actually read in years.
” There are very few way publications that attain “youre feeling” empowered. Most leave you totally anxiety-ridden, for not having the right kind of dinner party, setting the table in the right various kinds of route or fulfilling the right kind of people ,” Chamber said.
” Truth be told, I haven’t read Vogue in years ,” she confessed.” Maybe I was too close to it after have a job for so long, but I never felt I led a Vogue-y various kinds of life. The clothes are just irrelevant for most people- so ridiculously expensive .”
She added that” in fashion we are always trying to attain people buy something they don’t need. We don’t require any more containers, shirts or shoes. So we cajole, bully or encourage people into continue buying. I know glossy publications are meant to be aspirational, but why not be both useful and aspirational? That’s the kind of way publication I’d like to see .”
People clearly appreciated Chambers’ integrity on Twitter:
Others were less pleased. Conde Nast, which owns Vogue, released a brief statement to the Times that only addressed Chambers’ account of her firing, which reportedly happened at the desire of Edward Enninful, who was named editor-in-chief in Apriland will officially start in August .
” It’s usual for an incoming editor to construct some changes to the team. Any changes made are done with the full knowledge of senior management ,” the statement said.
Vestoj briefly took the interview down, quoting its” sensitive nature ,” before reinstating it in full with a note on Tuesday.
” In words of the reasons why it was removed, they are directly related to the industry pressures which Lucinda discusses in her interview ,” Vestoj Editor-in-Chief Anja Aronowsky Cronberg told the Times.” As you know, manner magazines are rarely independent because their existence depends on relationships with powerful institutions and individuals, whether it’s for tickets to presents, access in order to conduct interviews or advertising revenue .”
Cronberg added,” We hope Lucinda’s republished interview will trigger a discussion which might, in her words, lead to a more’ empowering and useful’ style media .”