Blog

Bobby Kennedy Demonstrated Us What A Unifying Presidential Candidate Looks Like

Category: Blog
209 0

“Make America Safe Again” is a slogan riveting enough to be the theme not just of Donald J. Trump’s convention kickoff this week in Cleveland, but of Robert F. Kennedy’s campaign for chairman half a century ago. But Kennedy had in mind a very different route to construct that happen, as is clear in the following an extract from Larry Tye’s biography- Bobby Kennedy: The Making of a Liberal Icon– out this month from Random House .

STR New/ Reuters

America in 1968 was at least as riven as it is today over racial tensions and matters of war and peace. We had lost both our postwar sense of unbounded the potentials and John F. Kennedy, the youthful chairman who embodied that exuberance and promised new frontiers ahead. In their place were cities in turmoil, whites fleeing to the suburbiums as blacks vented their annoyances in the streets, and a political system unable to respond. Now JFK’s messianic younger friend was offering fresh dreamings. He imagined a country divide less between right and left, or black and white, than between good and bad. The Bobby Kennedy of 1968 was a builder of bridges–between islands of blacks, browns, and blue-collar whites; between terrified parents and estranged youths; and between the creation he’d grown up in and the New Politics he heralded. At age forty-two he was on the way to becoming the tough liberal–or perhaps tender conservative–who might have sewn back together a divided land and whose vision seems at the least as resonant in today’s polarized America.

The first exam of that vision came in the first primary he entered, in Indiana, which was an unfortunate selection. Its politics traditionally was right-wing enough that it once boasted the largest Ku Klux Klan chapter in America, and Indiana was where Robert Welch, Jr ., had founded the John Birch Society. Jack Kennedy lost the state to Richard Nixon by more than two hundred thousand votes in 1960, and Alabama Governor George Wallace captured close to 30 percent of the Democratic primary tally in 1964. In his primary, Bobby faced not just Minnesota Senator Gene McCarthy, who had spent months organizing there, but also Roger Branigin, Indiana’s governor, who four years before had won by the largest margin in country history. Control of the tight-knit state party ensured Branigin the support of all but one of ninety-two county Democratic chairs, along with a war chest filled by what amounted to compulsory contributions from more than twenty thousand patronage workers. The governor had launched his campaign as a stand-in for LBJ, and he aimed it as a placeholder for Humphrey or for his own pipe dream of talking himself onto the national ticket. The topic in 1960 had been whether a Kennedy could buy Indiana. In 1968, it was whether Indiana would buy this Kennedy.

Bobby seemed oblivious to the challenge at first. In early April he was delivering the same catalog-of-pain speeches that worked so well on more liberal terrain and was buoyed by his huge mob. But the scenes on the nightly news showed a long-haired, high-voiced nominee being mobbed by fans who were too young and too black for an electorate that was over 90 percent white. Indiana fretted more about crime than poverty, and they wanted a father figure , not a fifth Beatle. So Kennedy changed course. By the time he returned to Indiana on April 22 for a pre-primary blitz, his barbers had a green light to harvest closer. His schedulers added factories, farm townships, and whistle-stop develops and subtracted universities. He started referring to himself as “former chief law enforcement officer of the United States” instead of “former attorney general, ” and staffers stopped calling him Bobby, opting for the more grown-up Robert or Bob. His stump speeches focused on crime, swine costs, and his love of Kokomo, Vincennes, and other burgs whose names he could scarcely pronounce or recollect. Even his clothes were toned down. Custom-fit suits from Lewis& Thomas Saltz Clothiers were replaced by one that, in the words of a New York Times reporter, “looked as if it had come off the rack of a small-town haberdasher.”

Mission achieved. His audiences now were mirroring the Hoosier State’s mid-American electorate, as veteran chronicler Teddy White find: “The matrons on their porches with their aprons, pin-curlers in hair; the old dames of Indiana, with their white pinafores over blue gowns, teeter-tottering in tennis shoes to catch a glimpse of him and mothering him from afar. (‘ He seems so tired, the poor boy, why do they construct him run so hard? ’) Blue-collar workingmen thickened the crowds, a rare sight in daytime political campaigning, and one assured them shyly wipe their hands on overalls or shirts before offering hands to the candidate to shake. One grasped for analogy: Along the freeway, as the car swept along, he was, plainly, The Kennedy, of the Family and Blood Royal, the Prince Coming to Town. In a working-class district he was Robin Hood. At night, in such places as Gary and South Bend on the final weekend, he was the Prince, Robin Hood and the Pied Piper all combined.”

Some journalists worried that after tailoring his messages to his galleries, he now sounded more like Barry Goldwater than Bobby Kennedy, a charge that resonated with younger staffers. There was no denying that he was a legislator , not a prelate, but he was far from the prototypical panderer. Anyone who knew him realise he’d been a law-and-order human since his days chasing down racketeers and mafiosi, just as he’d built Republican-style free enterprise a centerpiece of his Bedford-Stuyvesant experiment. Rural whites “don’t want to listen to what the blacks want and require. You have to get them listening by talking about what they’re interested in, before you can start trying to persuade them about other matters, ”Bobby said in siding with his older, more pragmatic consultants. Yet he knew how issues like crime could be used as a wedge between blacks and whites, poor and rich. So he made sure that every speech on crime included a call for justice, and that what he said to chambers of commerce differed in the sequence but not the elements from what he said in the slums.

Simple evenhandedness was not nearly enough, however. He had come too far to revert to his Bad or Old incarnations, and he’d never learned to mask his emotions. That meant building his audiences writhe. He told college kids everywhere he went that they could change the world, so why the hell weren’t they? He warned eight hundred medical students at Indiana University that they’d have to foot the bill for caring for the poor. As boo reverberate out, a doctor in developing asked whether the senator would end medical students’ cherished draft deferments. “The way things are going here today, probably yes, ” he told, smiling but serious. It happened again at a lunch of Civitans, a men’s service club. As his audience chewed on Salisbury steaks, he took the requisite questions on gun control and daylight saving time. Then he turned to his biggest issue–“American children, starving in America”–and asked, “Do you know, there are more rats than people in New York City? ” Hearing guffaws, this senator who was to be maintained nights by images of the hungry children he’d is in conformity with the Mississippi Delta grew grim: “Don’t . . . laugh.” Thomas Congdon, Jr ., an editor at The Saturday Evening Post who had started as a Kennedy cynic, attended the lunch and was struck by what he witnessed: “He was telling them precisely the opposite of what they wanted to hear.” It was demagoguery in reverse.

As the candidate was searching for a voice that was sensitive and at the same time genuine, his ad hoc collection of aides was coalescing into a powerhouse of an organization. At its centre was Gerard Doherty, the Massachusetts operative who’d parachuted in with an entourage of Vassar girls, Ivy League lawyers from K Street and Wall Street, and other honorary Kennedys.[ 1 ] Onto that unsteady base Team Kennedy grafted thousands of Hoosiers who had resisted joining Branigin’s army of professionals and McCarthy’s college corps. Back in Washington the campaign set up a “boiler room” like the one in 1960, where female partisans softly tracked, country by country, everything from the latest count of convention delegates to the allocation of bumper stickers. Money helped. In early April the campaign couldn’t afford a mimeograph machine; by early May it was commissioning opinion polls, TV ads, chartered airplanes with specially stocked galleys, voice trucks, cases of wine, and top-of-the-line hotels and rental autoes charged to Papa Joe’s charge card. Cash–tens of thousands of dollars–showed up in suitcases and shopping bags, delivered from the Park Agency office in Manhattan by Kennedy relatives or friends. Richard Corbett was supposed to be keeping track, but when nobody bided on budget, Corbett appealed to Bobby. “What is the presidency worth? ” asked the candidate, whose personal wealth by then was estimated at $10 million. “We will expend whatever is necessary.” Bobby’s mother Rose took the same position when one reporter too many quizzed her about buying elections: “It’s our fund and we’re free to expend it any route we please. It’s part of this campaign business. If you have money, you expend it to win.”

Bobby spent the earliest hours of election day doing what he often did, grabbing dinner with staff and journalists at the nearest greasy spoon, in this case Sam’s Attic in Indianapolis. Boyish no more, he looked like the wreck he was after a grueling first primary battle–lines on his forehead deepened to crevasses, puffy eyes bloodshot and haunted rather than blue and hostile, and skin blotched like an older man’s. He’d rub his hands over his face in a fruitless bid to banish the exhaustion. Yet campaigning was also restorative. “I loved the faces here in Indiana, ” he told his supper mates, “on the farmers, on the steelworkers, on the black kids.” After a couple of hours’ sleep he relieved the stress of waiting by quarterbacking a football match on the front lawn of his Holiday Inn, playing tough enough that an aide twisted his ankle and a journalist was sidelined with a bloody nose.

By nightfall Gene McCarthy’s snout would be bloodied, too, with Bobby scoring a bigger victory than anyone in his camp had hoped at the start. He took 42.3 percent of the vote–compared with Branigin’s 30.7 and McCarthy’s 27 — and won nine of eleven congressional districts along with fifty-six of the state’s sixty-three delegates. Kennedy beat Branigin in his home county, city, and precinct; doubled McCarthy’s take among Catholics, laborers, and younger voters; and won every substantial municipality except the college townships of Bloomington and Evansville. In black districts, he scored a crushing 85 percent of the votes, on the same night that he thrashed Humphrey nearly two to one in the primary in predominantly black Washington , D.C. He also carried the 7 largest counties in Indiana where Wallace, the racial-backlash candidate from Alabama, had done best in 1964. Bobby did less well in white precincts of Gary and in upper-income suburbiums and small town, where his foes benefited from Republican crossovers. TV analysts focused on the negative, and it was true that his competitors had won three of every 5 votes cast. But the committee is also was true that Bobby had trumped McCarthy’s showing in New Hampshire — 42.3 percent versus 42.2 — which the television networks and everyone else had scored as an epic triumph. Most newspaper reporters were more upbeat. Kennedy’s chief goal, David Broder wrote in The Washington Post, “is to expand the electorate–by bringing out many ordinary non-voters–on the voice hypothesi that those additional voters will give a big margin–to the man who has captivated their interest. In Indiana–despite the obstacles of a late start and strong opposition–that formula worked to perfection.”

Watching the televised results that night from his headquarters at the Sheraton-Lincoln Hotel, Kennedy heard McCarthy say that who came in first, second, or third wasn’t what counted. Really? “That’s not what my father told me, ” Bobby told, chuckling as he talked back to the TV set. “I always thought it was better to win. I learned that when I was about two.” But he also offered a sober reading of the voters’ verdict: “I truly have a chance now, merely a chance, to organize a new coalition of Negroes, and working-class white people, against the union and party Establishments.”

[ 1 ] These so-called honorary Kennedys ranged from Bobby’s old Justice Department staff to people who’d worked on Jack’s campaign, especially in 1960. “They were nasty good to us in ’6 0” was a familiar Bobby refrain, and one that assured him espouse a lot of political hacks who built his current staffers cringe.

Penguin Random House

Read more: www.huffingtonpost.com

Leave a comment

Categories

  • No categories
STAY UP TO DATE
Register now to get updates on promotions and coupons.